
Carbono: un mercado millonario sin reglas claras
La falta de una ley nacional crea incertidumbre en el campo y beneficia a algunas provincias que reclaman parte del valor de los créditos de carbono generados en establecimientos privados

The Argentine government highlights the opening of markets in the first half of the year, although criticism of the negotiations with the United States persists.
Against a backdrop of trade tensions and protectionism in the region, the Argentine government seeks to demonstrate its commitment to trade liberalization and the expansion of agribusiness markets.
According to presidential spokesperson Adrián Ravier, in the first six months of the year, 24 new markets for agroindustrial products were opened and 268 existing markets were reopened.
In addition to this, there were 292 additional openings announced in the first few months of the year, bringing the cumulative total of authorized destinations to 580.
In the context of regional competition, we see that other countries, such as Chile and Uruguay, have taken similar measures to expand their exports and strengthen their position in international markets.
Despite this progress, negotiations with the United States remain a hot-button issue on the country's political agenda. The controversy over tariffs and agricultural subsidies has created tensions that have yet to be resolved.
For investors and entrepreneurs, this information is relevant because it can influence their decision to invest in agro-industrial products and their choice of target market for their businesses.

La falta de una ley nacional crea incertidumbre en el campo y beneficia a algunas provincias que reclaman parte del valor de los créditos de carbono generados en establecimientos privados

El titular del Palacio de Hacienda aseguró tras su reunión con la directora gerente del FMI que la Argentina seguirá en el rumbo económico establecido, buscando consolidar el programa oficial.

La Argentina y Brasil comparten preocupaciones políticas, pero sus riesgos país son muy diferentes. Según economistas, la brecha entre ambos es significativa.